Ohh god, I had hoped you wouldn't mention that forum, I wasn't planing to mention it at all. Seems like regardless of how I'll write this answer it will come across as rude, so be it as it may.
Obviously there's a bit of a communication barrier here, because honestly no, I have no idea what it is that you think we should change.
Well, that's a pity. I thought that after hearing my repetitive explanations you might have gotten my perspective, I know I'm being tedious at this point but I honestly have no idea what else must I say to make myself clear.
The swords are proportioned according to real historical examples, the example you linked above wasn't something I tailored to your preference, it was a comparison between one of the in game swords as they are with a similar historical example.
I'm well aware of that, did I say it was done by you specifically for me? You posted that picture during our previous exchange of reactions about procedural weapons in an older Coffee Diary.
Seeing that procedural sword next to a real life example should have made my critique of your procedural weapons very clear, even if it has all matching components and it also looks a lot better than some other examples. The grip size, mainly it's length as well as the size of a cross-guard and it's thickness posses far more volume in comparison to the blade, that sword is "Grip Heavy", the grip/cross guard area of that sword is too large, it's oversized in comparison to a real one, and significantly so, it has too much "dead meat" or metal in its case. In fact many of your procedural weapons suffer from this very illness. The sword blades are aslo on a strong and chunky side, which is not historically inaccurate, no, but it's a domineering trend it seems.
I have posted a great video, I've talked about it before, which adresses this exact issue of sword poroptions, you probably are not going to watch it but it's right there.
Yes they are Ok compared to most examples we would find in most games, but I think that is mostly because video game swords have nothing in common with real examples, I think that at this point most people have no idea what a real sword should look like at all. Can't you notice a striking difference between proportions of a real sword and the procedural sword on that photo? I can, and I find procedural to be slightly but also very noticeably off in every aspect of it. Imagine changing the proportion of your favorite car, any car at all. Make the front end 5% shorter and the back end only 3% longer while increasing the hight of that car by 2,5%. I think you'd notice it immediately and the car would not longer appeal to you at all meanwhile being only "slightly different".
You even took this to the myarmoury forums, posting what I clearly said was incomplete and yet an actual expert said they saw nothing wrong with them besides them spanning an unlikely historical period, which is intentional and irrelevant.
I took it there to see what they will say and to have an exchange of ideas there with adults who won't shut me up, post snarky comments, white knight for, well you know who and such like. I wanted to have a conversation with real adults only and not a mixed bag of people who often times do not wish to engage with me in good faith, I didn't do it to get you, but to have a conversation and in a sense test my own opinions against theirs if need be. Also, please keep in mind that I didn't mention that thread on this forum nor I was planing to do it as some kind of hidden trump card, you brought it up first.
As for the expert, I don't believe Victor is an actual sword maker with years of experience, I assume he is more of a very knowledgeable enthusiast. I might be wrong on this one of course. Also, did you not see my reply where I kindly asked for his opinion and replied with my own 50cents? On other hand Craig is a very well known designer of swords for a very reputable manufacturer with more than 2 decades of experience. His opinion was somewhat different. And yet it was not my intention to use their opinions against you from the get go, I wanted to figure out what others would say and how they would say it so perhaps I could use different types of explanations, or maybe even be proven wrong?
I'm always listening to feedback, but I'm definitely not getting a clear message here and it's just becoming a waste of my time. This will all be improved and significantly expanded on either way, so we'll just keep doing what we're doing.
I have tried and given it all I could.